Privateness frontiers in clients’ relations with banks

Issue 1/2023 cover

Acquisti, A., Brandimarte, L., & Loewenstein, G. (2015). Privateness and human conduct within the age of data. Science, 347(6221), 509–515.
View in Google Scholar

Acquisti, A., & Grossklags, J. (2006). Privateness and rationality. In Okay. J. Strandburg & D. S. Raicu (Eds.), Privateness and applied sciences of identification. A cross-disciplinary dialog (pp. 15–29). Springer.
View in Google Scholar

Acquisti, A., Taylor, C. R., & Wagman, L. (2016). The economics of privateness. Journal of Financial Literature, 54(2), 442–492.
View in Google Scholar

Arfan, M., & Khan, R. (2017). Ordinal logit and multilevel ordinal logit fashions: An utility on wealth Index MICS-Survey Information. Pakistan Journal of Statistics and Operation Analysis, 13(1), 211–226.
View in Google Scholar

Ashworth, L., & Free, C. (2006). Advertising dataveillance and digital privateness: Utilizing theories of justice to know shoppers’ on-line privateness issues. Journal of Enterprise Ethics, 67(2), 107–123.
View in Google Scholar

Askar, M. A. E., Aboutabl, A. E., & Galal, A. (2022). Using social media information analytics to reinforce banking companies. Clever Info Administration, 14, 1–14.
View in Google Scholar

Azucar, D., Marengo, D., & Settanni, M. (2018). Predicting the Huge 5 persona traits from digital footprints on social media: A meta-analysis. Character and Particular person Variations, 124, 150–159.
View in Google Scholar

Balaban, D., & Mustățea, M. (2021). Privateness issues in cell communication. A person’s perspective. Philobiblon, 26, 101–114.
View in Google Scholar

Barth, S., & De Jong, M. (2017). The privateness paradox—investigating discrepancies between expressed privateness issues and precise on-line conduct—a scientific literature evaluate. Telematics and Informatics, 34(7), 1038-1058.
View in Google Scholar

Batrinca, B., & Treleaven, P. C. (2015). Social media analytics: A survey of strategies, instruments and platforms. AI & Society, 30(1), 89–116.
View in Google Scholar

Behrendt, H., & Loh, W. (2022). Knowledgeable consent and algorithmic discrimination—is making a gift of your information the brand new susceptible? Evaluate of Social Economic system, 80(1), 58–84.
View in Google Scholar

Bejger, S., & Elster, S. (2020). Synthetic Intelligence in financial determination making: The best way to guarantee a belief? Ekonomia i Prawo. Economics and Regulation, 19(3), 411–434.
View in Google Scholar

Belanger, F., & Crossler, R. (2011). Privateness within the digital age: A evaluate of data privateness analysis in info programs. MIS Quarterly, 35(4), 1017–1041.
View in Google Scholar

Betzing, J. H., Tietz, M., vom Brocke, J., & Becker, J. (2020). The impression of transparency on cell privateness determination making. Digital Markets, 30(3), 607–625.
View in Google Scholar

Cai, Y., Yee, G., Gu, Y., & Lung, Ch. H. (2020). Threats to internet advertising and countermeasures: A technical survey. Digital Threats: Analysis and Follow, 1(2), 1–27.
View in Google Scholar

Cambridge Centre for Different Finance. (2020). Reworking paradigms. A worldwide AI in monetary companies survey. https://www.jbs.cam.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/2020-ccaf-ai-in-financial-services-survey.pdf
View in Google Scholar

Chai, S. (2020). Does cultural distinction matter on social media? An examination of the moral tradition and data privateness issues. Sustainability, 12(19), 8286.
View in Google Scholar

Chai, S., & Kim, M. (2012). A socio-technical strategy to information contribution conduct: An empirical investigation of social networking websites customers. Worldwide Journal of Info Administration, 32(2), 118–126.
View in Google Scholar

Chen, H. T., & Chen, W. (2015). Couldn’t or wouldn’t? The affect of privateness issues and self-efficacy in privateness administration on privateness safety. Cyberpsychology, Conduct, and Social Networking, 18(1), 13–19.
View in Google Scholar

Cheung, C., Lee, Z. W., & Chan, T. Okay. (2015). Self-disclosure in social networking websites: The function of perceived value, perceived advantages and social affect. Web Analysis, 25(2), 279–299.
View in Google Scholar

Chowdhury, R. M. M. (2019). The ethical foundations of shopper ethics. Journal of Enterprise Ethics, 158(1), 585–601.
View in Google Scholar

Cottrell, A., & Lucchetti, R. (2014). Gretl person’s information. Gnu regression, econometrics and time-series library. https://www.academia.edu/31887034/Gretl_Users_Guide_Gnu_Regression_Econometrics_and_Time_series_Library
View in Google Scholar

Credit score Suisse. (2020). Information safety info. https://www.credit-suisse.com/media/property/private-banking/docs/uk/data-privacy-policy.pdf
View in Google Scholar

Culnan, M. J., & Bies, R. J. (2003). Client privateness: Balancing financial and justice issues. Journal of Social Points, 59(2), 323–342.
View in Google Scholar

Dinev, T., & Hart, P. (2006). An prolonged privateness calculus mannequin for e-commerce transactions. Info Methods Analysis, 17(1), 61–80.
View in Google Scholar

Directive on privateness and digital communications. (2002). Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2002 in regards to the processing of private information and the safety of privateness within the digital communications sector. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32002L0058&from=EN
View in Google Scholar

Du, J., Kerkhof, P., & Van Koningsbruggen, G. M. (2019). Predictors of social media self-control failure: fast gratifications, ordinary checking, ubiquity, and notifications. Cyberpsychology, Conduct, and Social Networking, 22(7), 477–485.
View in Google Scholar

European Fee. (2017). Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council in regards to the respect for personal life and the safety of private information in digital communications and repealing Directive 2002/58/EC. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52017PC0010&from=EN
View in Google Scholar

European Fee. (2019). Ethics tips for reliable AI. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai
View in Google Scholar

European Parliament. (2018). Directive (EU) 2018/843 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 Might 2018 amending Directive (EU) 2015/849 on the prevention of the usage of the monetary system for the needs of cash laundering or terrorist financing, and amending Directives 2009/138/EC and 2013/36/EU. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32018L0843&from=EN
View in Google Scholar

Fife, E., & Orjuela, J. (2012). The privateness calculus: Cell apps and person perceptions of privateness and safety. Worldwide Journal of Engineering Enterprise Administration, 4, 1–10.
View in Google Scholar

Monetary Stability Board. (2017, November 1). Synthetic Intelligence and machine studying in monetary companies. https://www.fsb.org/2017/11/artificial-intelligence-and-machine-learning-in-financial-service/
View in Google Scholar

Flender, C., & Müller, G. (2012). Kind indeterminacy in privateness choices: the privateness paradox revisited. In J. Busemeyer, F. Dubois, A. Lambert-Mogiliansky & M. Melucci (Eds.), Quantum interplay. Lecture notes in laptop science (pp. 148–159). Springer-Verlag.
View in Google Scholar

Floridi, L. (2006). 4 challenges for a idea of informational privateness. Ethics and Info Know-how, 8(3), 109–119.
View in Google Scholar

Floridi, L., & Taddeo, M. (2016). What’s information ethics? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 374(2083), 20160360.
View in Google Scholar

Framework Directive. (2002). Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of seven March 2002 on a typical regulatory framework for digital communications networks and companies. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32002L0021&from=pl
View in Google Scholar

Gancarczyk, M., Łasak, P., & Gancarczyk, J. (2022). The fintech transformation of banking: Governance dynamics and socio-economic outcomes in spatial contexts. Entrepreneurial Enterprise and Economics Evaluate, 10(3), 143–165. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2022.100309
View in Google Scholar

Common Information Safety Regulation (GDPR). (2016). Regulation (Eu) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the safety of pure individuals with regard to the processing of private information and on the free motion of such information, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv:OJ.L_.2016.119.01.0001.01.ENG
View in Google Scholar

Giza, W., & Wilk, B. (2021). Revolution 4.0 and its implications for shopper behaviour. Entrepreneurial Enterprise and Economics Evaluate, 9(4), 195–206. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2021.090412
View in Google Scholar

Hacker, P. (2021). A authorized framework for AI coaching information—from first rules to the Synthetic Intelligence Act. Regulation, Innovation and Know-how, 13(2), 257–301.
View in Google Scholar

Hagerty, A., & Rubinov, I. (2019). International AI ethics: A evaluate of the social impacts and moral implications of Synthetic Intelligence. ArXiv, 1907.07892. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1907.07892
View in Google Scholar

Hasal, M., Nowaková, J., Saghair, Okay. A., Abdulla, H., Snášel, V., & Ogiela, L. (2021). Chatbots: Safety, privateness, information safety, and social features. Concurrency and Computation. Follow and Expertise, 33(1), e6426.
View in Google Scholar

Hu, Q., & Ma, S. (2010). Does privateness nonetheless matter within the period of net 2.0? A qualitative research of person conduct in direction of on-line social networking actions. PACIS, 2, 591–602.
View in Google Scholar

Kehr, F., Kowatsch, T., Wentzel, D., & Fleisch, E. (2015). Blissfully ignorant: the consequences of normal privateness issues, normal institutional belief, and have an effect on within the privateness calculus. Info Methods Journal, 25(6), 607–635.
View in Google Scholar

Keith, M. J., Thompson, S. C., Hale, J., Lowry, P. B., & Greer, Ch. (2013). Info disclosure on cell gadgets: Re-examining privateness calculus with precise person conduct. Worldwide Journal of Human-Pc Research, 71(12), 1163–1173.
View in Google Scholar

Kirakosyan, Okay. (2015). Social media utilization in banking trade and its managerial view: Case research for Mexican banking system. Journal of Financial and Social Growth, 2(1), 34–43.
View in Google Scholar

Korol, T., & Fotiadis, A. Okay. (2022). Implementing Synthetic Intelligence in forecasting the chance of private bankruptcies in Poland and Taiwan. Oeconomia Copernicana, 13(2), 407–438.
View in Google Scholar

Loh, W. (2018). A practice-theoretical account of privateness. Ethics and Info Know-how, 20(2), 233–247.
View in Google Scholar

Margulis, S. T. (2003). Privateness as a social problem and behavioral idea. Journal of Social Points, 59(2), 243–261.
View in Google Scholar

Martin, Okay. (2011). Info know-how and privateness: conceptual muddles or privateness vacuums? Ethics and Info Know-how, 14(4), 267–284.
View in Google Scholar

Martin, Okay. (2016). Understanding privateness on-line: growth of a social contract strategy to privateness. Journal of Enterprise Ethics, 137(3), 551–569.
View in Google Scholar

Martin, Okay. (2019). Moral implications and accountability of algorithms. Journal of Enterprise Ethics, 160(4), 835–850.
View in Google Scholar

McGuinness, D. M., & Simon, A. (2018). Info disclosure, privateness behaviours, and attitudes concerning employer surveillance of social networking websites. IFLA Journal, 44(3), 203–222.
View in Google Scholar

Millar, J. (2017). Ethics settings for autonomous autos. In P. Lin, R. Jenkins & Okay. Abney (Eds.), Robotic ethics 2.0. From autonomous automobiles to synthetic intelligence (pp. 20–34). Oxford College Press.
View in Google Scholar

Misselhorn, C. (2018). Synthetic morality. Ideas, points and challenges. Society, 55(2), 161–169.
View in Google Scholar

Muhammad, S. S., Dey, B. L., Syed Alwi, S. F., Kamal, M. M., & Asaad, Y. (2022), Shoppers’ willingness to share digital footprints on social media: The function of affective belief. Info Know-how & Folks, 36(2), 595–625.
View in Google Scholar

Muhammad, S. S., Dey, B. L., & Weerakkody, V. (2018). Evaluation of things that affect clients’ willingness to depart massive information digital footprints on social media: A scientific evaluate of literature. Info Methods Frontiers, 20(3), 559–576.
View in Google Scholar

Muravyeva, E., Janssen, J., Specht, M., & Custers, B. (2020). Exploring options to the privateness paradox within the context of e-assessment: Knowledgeable consent revisited. Ethics and Info Know-how, 22(3), 223–238.
View in Google Scholar

Mutimukwe, Ch., Kolkowska, E., & Grönlund, Å. (2019). Info privateness in e-service: Impact of organizational privateness assurances on particular person privateness issues, perceptions, belief and self-disclosure conduct. Authorities Info Quarterly, 37(1), 101413.
View in Google Scholar

Nguyen, T., & Dang, T. (2019). Privateness preserving biometric-based distant authentication with safe processing unit on untrusted server. IET Biometrics, 8(1), 79–91.
View in Google Scholar

Nissenbaum, H. (2009). Privateness in context: Know-how, privateness, and the integrity of social life. Stanford College Press.
View in Google Scholar

Obar, J., & Oeldorf-Hirsch, A. (2020). The most important lie on the web: Ignoring the privateness insurance policies and phrases of service insurance policies of social networking companies. Info, Communication & Society, 23(1), 128–147.
View in Google Scholar

OECD. (2021). Synthetic Intelligence, machine studying and large information in finance: alternatives, challenges, and implications for coverage makers. https://www.oecd.org/finance/artificial-intelligence-machine-learning-big-data-in-finance.htm
View in Google Scholar

Parusheva, S. (2017). Social media banking fashions: A case research of a sensible implementation in banking sector. Financial Research, 3, 125–141.
View in Google Scholar

Cost Companies Directive 2. (2015). Directive (EU) 2015/2366 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2015 on cost companies within the inner market, amending Directives 2002/65/EC, 2009/110/EC and 2013/36/EU and Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010, and repealing Directive 2007/64/EC. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32015L2366&from=PL
View in Google Scholar

Pentina, I., Zhang, L., Bata, H., & Chen, Y. (2016). Exploring privateness paradox in information-sensitive cell app adoption: A cross-cultural comparability. Computer systems in Human Conduct, 65, 409–419.
View in Google Scholar

Petronio, S. (2002). Boundaries of privateness: Dialectics of disclosure. State College of New York Press.
View in Google Scholar

Piotrowska, A. I., Polasik, M., & Piotrowski, D. (2017). Prospects for the appliance of biometrics within the Polish banking sector. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Financial Coverage, 12(3), 501–518.
View in Google Scholar

Piotrowski, D. (2022). Client perceived ethicality of banks within the period of digitalisation: The case of Poland. Economics and Enterprise Evaluate, 22(1), 90–114.
View in Google Scholar

Pollach, I. (2005). A typology of communicative methods in on-line privateness insurance policies: Ethics, energy and knowledgeable consent. Journal of Enterprise Ethics, 62(3), 221–235.
View in Google Scholar

Recast. (2018). Directive 2018/1972 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 establishing the European Digital Communications Code. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32018L1972
View in Google Scholar

Reynolds, S. J. (2008). Ethical attentiveness: who pays consideration to the ethical features of life? Journal of Utilized Psychology, 93(5), 1027–1041.
View in Google Scholar

Rodrigues, A., Ferreira, F., Teixeira, F., & Zopounidis, C. (2022). Synthetic Intelligence, digital transformation and cybersecurity within the banking sector: A multi-stakehol-der cognition-driven framework. Analysis in Worldwide Enterprise and Finance, 60, 101616.
View in Google Scholar

Roessler, B. (2015). Ought to private information be a tradable good? On the ethical limits of markets in privateness. In B. Roessler & D. Mokrosinska (Eds.), Social dimensions of privateness: Interdisciplinary views (pp. 141–161). Cambridge College Press.
View in Google Scholar

Royakkers, L., Timmer, J., Kool, L., & Est, R. (2018). Societal and moral problems with digitization. Ethics and Info Know-how, 20(2), 127–142.
View in Google Scholar

Sarathy, R., & Robertson, C. J. (2003). Strategic and moral issues in managing digital privateness. Journal of Enterprise Ethics, 46(2), 111–126.
View in Google Scholar

Schwartz, M. S. (2016). Moral decision-making idea: An built-in strategy. Journal of Enterprise Ethics, 139(4), 755–776.
View in Google Scholar

Shadbolt, N., & Hampson, R. (2018). The digital ape: The best way to reside (in peace) with sensible machines. Scribe.
View in Google Scholar

Shane-Simpson, C., Manago, A., Gaggi, N., & Gillespie-Lynch, Okay. (2018). Why do school college students choose Fb, Twitter, or Instagram? Web site affordances, tensions between privateness and self-expression, and implications for social capital. Computer systems in Human Conduct, 86, 276–288.
View in Google Scholar

Solove, D. J. (2013). Introduction: privateness self-management and the consent dilemma. Harvard Regulation Evaluate, 126(7), 1880–1903.
View in Google Scholar

Steppe, R. (2017). On-line value discrimination and private information: A Common Information Safety Regulation perspective. Pc Regulation & Safety Evaluate, 33(6), 768–785.
View in Google Scholar

Stutzman, F., Gross, R., & Acquisti, A. (2013). Silent listeners: The evolution of privateness and disclosure on Fb. Journal of Privateness and Confidentiality, 4(2), 7–41.
View in Google Scholar

Tene, O., & Polonetsky, J. (2013). Huge information for all: Privateness and person management within the age of analytics. Northwestern Journal of Know-how and Mental Property, 11, 239–273.
View in Google Scholar

Toti, J. F., Diallo, M. F., & Huaman-Ramirez, R. (2021). Moral sensitivity in shoppers’ decision-making: The mediating and moderating function of inner locus of management. Journal of Enterprise Analysis, 131, 168–182.
View in Google Scholar

Trivedi, N., Asamoah, D. A., & Doran, D. (2018). Maintain the conversations going: Engagement-based shopper segmentation on on-line social service platforms. Info Methods Frontiers, 20(2), 239–257.
View in Google Scholar

Waliszewski, Okay., & Zięba-Szklarska, M. (2020). Robo-advisors as automated private monetary planners—SWOT evaluation. Journal of Finance and Monetary Regulation, 3(27), 155–173.
View in Google Scholar

Wernaart, B. (2021). Creating a roadmap for the ethical programming of sensible know-how. Know-how in Society, 64(10), 101466.
View in Google Scholar

Whiting, A., & Williams, D. (2013). Why folks use social media: A makes use of and gratifications strategy. Qualitative Market Analysis: An Worldwide Journal, 16(4), 362–369.
View in Google Scholar

Wooldridge, J. (2010). Econometric evaluation of cross part and panel information. MIT Press.
View in Google Scholar

Wottrich, V. M., van Reijmersdal, E. A., & Smit, E. G. (2019). App customers unwittingly within the highlight: A mannequin of privateness safety in cell apps. Journal of Client Affairs, 53(3), 1056–1083.
View in Google Scholar

Xie, W., & Karan, Okay. (2019). Shoppers’ privateness concern and privateness safety on social community websites within the period of massive information: Empirical proof from school college students. Journal of Interactive Promoting, 19(3), 187–201.
View in Google Scholar

Yamin, M. (2019). Info applied sciences of twenty first century and their impression on the society. Worldwide Journal of Info Know-how, 11(4), 759–766.
View in Google Scholar

Yee, G. O. M. (2017). Visualization and prioritization of privateness dangers in software program programs. Worldwide Journal on Advances in Safety, 10(1&2), 14–25.
View in Google Scholar

Zuiderveen Borgesius, F., & Poort, J. (2017). On-line value discrimination and EU information privateness legislation. Journal of Client Coverage, 40(3), 347–366.
View in Google Scholar

Author: Harold Garcia